2

kaleidoscope

Posted by HuiHui on 6:30 PM
Ask and you shall receive... yup, Mark shared with me an excellent article from Harvard Business review, vol 82, no2 (2004 Feb) pp 102-109, called Success That Lasts. Thanks Mark. The preface of the paper says "Single minded ambition is a great way to achieve some goals-but it that really success? New research reveals surprisingly practical ways to find professional and personal fulfillment." From here you can already see that the authors pro work-life balance. Many people assume success requires a winner-takes-all approach. They believe that success depends on putting all your energy into achieving one goal, be it a single-minded focus on your job or a commitment to being the best soccer mom in your community. But no matter how noble, one goal can't satisfy all of a person's complex needs and desires. Fortunately, success doesn't have to be seen as one-dimensional tug-of-war between achievement and happiness. **light bulb blinking**

The complexity of success involves more than a heart-pounding race to the finish line. Laura Nash and Howard Stevenson uncovered four irreducible components of enduring success; happiness (feelings of pleasure or contentment about your life); achievement (accomplishments that compare favorably against similar goals others have strived for); significance (the sense that you've make a positive impact on people you care about); and legacy (a way to establish your values or accomplishments so as to help others find future success). Next, they went on to compare an effective success strategy to a kaleidoscope with 4 chambers - happiness, achievement, significance, and legacy. In this metaphor, success is about choice, movement, pattern, and a structure that holds all the separated activities together. How colorful and well balanced is your kaleidoscope right now?

2 Comments

Anonymous says:

Yeah..I like this article as well. Was particularly impressed with the idea of 'deberate imposition of limits' as well as 'versatile refocusing'....


yeah, i guess what you meant by deliberate imposting limit is same as the concept of "just enough" mentioned in the article. indeed, it's difficult to appreciate "enough" in the society's addiction to infinite "more". in this light, rise the question, when only do we give our best, our utmost, our all?

Copyright © 2009 me All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek. | Bloggerized by FalconHive.